- Teams are made too large. Teams are a way to organize small groups; they are not the antidote to bureaucracy.
- Boundaries are too often left fuzzy – confusion is a productivity killer. What's in, what's out?
- The mission is not made compelling; boredom and disinterest dont' set the stage for inspired work.
- Team members too often are selected by making the easy choices, selected by position and availability and not by rigorous evaluation
- There is no allowance for a 'nemesis' member to neutralize 'group think'.
- Team membership is allowed to turnover too rapidly, thereby diluting cohesion and squandering productivity dependent upon personal relationships.
- There is bad decision-making process or inadequate decision-making skills.
- The membership includes difficult people, talented eccentrics that don't share and work collectively
- There is competition among members, often leading to secrecy and compartmentalization, quite opposite to collaboration
- There are empowerment uncertainties, awkward and untimely decision chains, and confusion about roles, rights, and responsibilities.
- Many personnel issues are left unresolved: "What do I have to give up?"
For more reading and insight, take a look at these references:
Robbins, H and Finley, M. "The New Why Teams Don't Work: What goes wrong and how to make it right" Berrett - Koehler, San Francisco, 2000
Some ideas from this blog were inspired by: Coutu, D. "Why Teams Don't Work", Interview with Dr. J. Richard Hackman, Harvard Business Review, Boston, May 2009
Are you networked on LinkedIn? If so, share this article with your network by clicking on the link.
